🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, undermining the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Over System and Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when issued by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause activated. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power In the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

A Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their methods accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this represents neoliberalism at work: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss them for playing excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then discard them for taking excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.